The article is much improved, especially in readability. I have a few suggestions to finalise it for publication:
1. I like the idea of bringing other voices into the dialogue, to illustrate that the authors' living educational theories are indeed living, with input from colleagues, friends, etc. I found it confusing, however, to call the other voices Reflection, because the authors (Cathy and Jackie) both reflect throughout the article. I suggest simply using the names of these other 'characters' as they appear in the story.
2. Similarly, I found it difficult at times to know whose voice I was reading, because the article has multiple 'levels': the authors in their article authoring mode, the authors voices in quotations, the authors reflecting, etc. I think that this could be solved with some clever formatting (italics, or different colours for different voices, etc.), which would make it very clear whose voice and at which level.
3. Check for consistency on terminology (video versus clip, etc.).